« Marginalizing Enterprise Architecture | Main | Business as Unusual »

January 14, 2010

Comments

Victor Brown

Interesting question. For decades I’ve been a strong proponent of process (my focus is IT) as a means of ensuring quality and consistency. My experience has been that good processes, driven by and managed by effective (meaningful) metrics, are the panacea for variations in skill and experience.

It’s also important, of course, to build checkpoints and feedback into the processes that enable and encourage innovation, and keep the metrics accurate and relevant. It can be a tricky balance between ensuring that processes are followed – presumably their value is that they are a prescription for a predictable and desirable outcome – and ensuring that they aren’t followed blindly.

Unfortunately, processes often do stifle and even punish “thinking”, particularly when they’re a substitute for management and leadership. So I suppose that, over time, in an environment driven by blind processes, the organization may lose its ability (motivation) to think!

Good piece, Michael. Thanks.

Vic

LouiseWyatt32

Every one knows that our life seems to be very expensive, but different people need money for various things and not every man gets enough money. Therefore to receive quick loans or consolidation loans would be good solution.

The comments to this entry are closed.

  • Burton Group Free Resources Stay Connected Stay Connected Stay Connected Stay Connected


Blog powered by Typepad